Do you think the "box toe area" on the puma v1.10's affect a normal persons strike zone?

Dose the "powerspine" on the adidas predator x actually work?

What do you think of the Adidas predator X DB? (David Beckham version)

At the moment I am using the Puma v.1.08, which is a really good boot. My only concern is the tip – too big and clumsy. I prefer a light weight boot in micro fiber because of the fact that leather boots needs to be taken care of all the time – and off course because of the weight. Besides from the Puma light weight boot I have also tried Vapors. They tore the skin of my heals, so I don't want to go down that road again.

Do you think the David Beckham version of the Predator in micro fiber would be a good choice for me?

The top three are Adidas, Nike and Puma (in that order), below these are the likes of Reebok, Lotto, Diadora and now Under Armour and they have some releases that rank in the top 10.

The reason they use Kangaroo leather is because it has suitable properties for the rigors of soccer. First, it is very dependable and wont rip easily, it is also light and durable. Another great thing about Kangaroo leather is that has the ability to keep water out…ensuring your cleats last if you take care of them properly.

Companies have started to use synthetic material more, as they develop and optimize it for performance in the top ranges. They use this type of material for its lightweight properties…you just need to look at the Nike Superfly as an example of how companies are cutting down on the weight of cleats.

I hope this helps, and best of luck with your paper!

I am doing a research paer for a senior english class over the top cleats made and sold. so far i have noticed the top 2 favored brands are puma and adidas. they almost fill the top ten list of cleats. the only other competetor is nike. what is your opinion?

I have also noticed that the top 3 cleats in the last 40 top 10 list i've looked at are made with kangaroo leather or carbon fiber as their main componenet. why is this?

I am sorry to hear you have had some ankle issues, no fun for sure! I know what you mean about the T90 Laser II in the midsole, primarily caused by the fact that the front cover is immovable! I have a pair of T90 III's on the way for testing, I will let you know how they fit.

Guess I'll wait for the new Puma cleats and see what they are about. My feet aren't that wide I guess the arch has alot to do with it. Lots of ankle issues, I have to have the high ankle support that preds offer and most Puma cleats offer. Thanks for the advice. I just wish I was a pro-athlete and had specialist come messure my feet and make cleats just for me. Oh to dream…..

First thing, I found the Puma V1.10 to fit very tight. They do suit wide feet around the front of the foot, but the heel and midsole are tight! If you read my review you will see what I'm talking about.

My recommendation for players with wide feet is the Under Armour Dominate. The midsole might also suit your high arch profile (here is a review http://www.soccercleats101.com/2009/06/09/under-a… A second option would be the Nike T90 II range (not the new ones released but the II version). Include the fact that they are hugely discounted a the mo and they might be worth getting.

I also liked the Puma V-Konstruct, and if you wanted to wait a few weeks, Puma have a new release coming out that you might be interested! I have not tested them yet, but I hear they are wide fitting? More on these in the next few weeks.

Hope this helps!