Deprecated: Function is_staging_site is deprecated since version 3.3.0! Use in_safe_mode instead. in /home/cleatolo/public_html/ on line 6031
Puma V1.11 K Review - Soccer Cleats 101
Deprecated: Function is_staging_site is deprecated since version 3.3.0! Use in_safe_mode instead. in /home/cleatolo/public_html/ on line 6031
Monday , June 17 2024

Puma V1.11 K Review

Puma V1.11 K

When it comes to leather uppers, I am personally a fan of the touch and control benefits that are offered. That is why, having already tested the synthetic version of the Puma V1.11, I took the opportunity to pick up a pair in the k-leather upper for review. At 8.4oz, the boot is designed to be a speed boot and the shape of the upper around the toes fulfills the requirements of the V series! For testing, I wore the Fluo Green/Midnight Navy/White colorway in a size 9.5US.

You will find that some of this review is similar to the Puma V1.11 synthetic review, specifically in areas where the boots are extremely similar.

Important: Getting the right size!
If you are not familiar with Puma shoes, they generally fit tight – my recommendation for the k-leather version is very similar to the synthetic version, order up a half size. You will get some stretch from the K-leather upper, but the reason that I recommend a half size up is related to the shape of the boot, with the toe region offering a flat rather than round fit. For those of you who know their size in previous V series releases, these fit very similarly, with some additional width at the top of the boot.

Puma V1.11 K Profile

Breaking In
Ensuring I had the right size from first wear resulted in a smooth break in period with these boots. My experience was again very similar, with the soleplate starting out a little stiff. But, after a training session they quickly got into the swing of things! The front of the boot has that strange “V” angle design we have become familiar with on the V series. I refer to it as a box toe because of its sharp angle appearance. It is an odd comment, but if you have a toe that is longer than your big toe, you will probably want to avoid these! I ended wearing them in several training sessions before the first game.

Leather Upper
There is just something about leather that immediately increases the appeal of a boot for me. There are some players that prefer synthetic, but I just feel that leather has more to offer in terms of touch. And falling right in-line, the addition of K-Leather to the V1.11 makes for an even better boot! Not only does the leather feel soft, but the stitching ensures it contours with the shape of your foot as you connect with the ball, producing a glove like fit. It could also be argued that the Puma cat looks much happier in leather!

Puma V1.11 K

Puma V1.11 K

When it came to game time, the V1.11 perform at a competitive level. The lightweight nature of the boot suited my game and I found them to be an effective tool in terms of acceleration. Crossing felt ok, it is one area they fall slightly short. Along the front of the boot, stitching is applied to ensure you are getting a durable boot, but this causes the material to rise slightly. Getting under the ball on a pitch with little grass might cause issues. On grass, they worked out well and I felt like they were more suited. The leather upper give you an extra supple touch. I found that as the ball contacts your foot, the leather molds to your foot and allows for more cushioning. I also found that while wet, the leather gives a grippier feel on the ball.

Something I didn’t mention on the synthetic review that I did notice with these was problematic traction. I played several games at night when there was mist on the field, and I have to admit that on several occasions I lost my footing. This was particularly true while dribbling and trying to stop quickly. It wasn’t a consistent problem, but be warned that there might be times when they fail to offer exactly what you need!

Puma V1.11 K soleplate

Puma V1.11 K

The negatives I have with the V1.11 are primarily centered around size. There were definitely moments when I thought I needed a full size up rather than the additional half size I wore. Another negative was that of traction, and I was a little disappointed when I lost my footing on several occasions. The Puma blades are generally designed with more angled dimensions than regular cleats, something that is worth taking into consideration. Other than that

With each new release in a series, companies look to go bigger and better – Puma have achieved that with this release. It is the simple things such as the addition of a fully functional lace cover, and the redesigned front strike zone that features a more textured effect. I definitely don’t think the Puma V1.11 are suited for all players and I have no doubt that people will buy them only to discover the shape and fit causes them problems on the field. But those players who find them to be effective will experience a fantastic match and a high performer. If I had to choose between the leather and synthetic version, my vote definitely goes to the Leather. The soft upper just adds another level, with a better touch and feel as you move with the ball at your feet. The weight difference between both versions is 0.2oz – something only a prima dona would complain about! (Don’t be that guy) If you are looking for a different colorway, Puma also has a White/Black/Dresden Blue colorway in K-Leather available.

Puma V1.11 K

*Boots supplied for review by Puma Soccer

About Bryan Byrne

The mastermind behind the revolution that is SoccerCleats101. Bryan started this website back in 2008 and has been testing boots on a daily basis ever since. Check out our About Page for more details on Bryan and the website.

Check Also

adidas X Crazyfast+ FG Soccer Cleat Review

adidas X Crazyfast+ FG Review

Speed redefined and expectations surpassed – that’s the expectation with a release like the adidas …


  1. is it me or does that leather look amazing? you need some scores up for these. Or did you score them the same as the synthetic version?

  2. Good review. I don't think review scores are important at all anyway.

  3. Would you say the traction in the v1.11 SL is the same, since the stud patterns are so similar? I just got the puma v1.11 K, choosing it over the SL, hoping I'd get a more durable and better fitting boot.

  4. which did you prefer between the Puma v1.11 SL and the Puma v1.11 K ? In terms of comfort, durability, and touch? I found them both for $150 so its just a matter of which one to choose. Any suggestions and opinions are much appreciated. Thanks!

    • Due to their shape/fit, I prefer the V1.11 SL. The V1.11 K does have a better fit than the regular version, but the front V design can cause some problems. With both, make sure to factor in size as they fit differently!

  5. F50 micoach or v1.11? And why

  6. Hello,

    How would you compare the touch of these boots to that of the adizero (both new and old). And would getting the soft ground version solve the problem of traction

    • So I just got these. I can see how you might have traction issues on softer ground or natural turf but they're really good on artificial astro turf. The touch is much better than all versions of the adizero simply because it uses k-leather and the adizeros don't.

  7. Here is my review to the V1.11 K-Leather:-

  8. I used the v1.10 sl and really liked it. They suited me a lot better than the adizeros. Am looking for a leather shoe now and have been considering the v1.11 K. Is it a good buy since the sl did suit me.(Also considering that my big toe is my longest toe)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.